Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of transcranial electrical stimulation combined with dual-task training in stroke, mild cognitive impairment and Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Fu Y, Wang W, Yan Q, Zhu C, Chai SC, Subramaniam P, Yao L, Singh DKA

Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Aim: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) or transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) combined with dual task training (DTT) on physical and cognitive functions in adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Parkinson's disease (PD), and stroke disorders.

Method: We conducted a systematic search of the Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and CINAHL databases for English-language literature on randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of tDCS, tACS, or tRNS combined with DTT in adults with MCI, PD, and stroke. The search covered studies from the inception of each database up to November 21, 2025. The initial screening of selected articles was conducted independently by two researchers (YLQ and WLW).

Results: A total of twelve studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising individuals with stroke (n = 4), MCI (n = 3), and PD (n = 5). Meta-analysis revealed that active tDCS+DTT yielded no significant overall improvement in global cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): SMD = 0.09, 95% CI [-0.49, 0.66], p = 0.77, I2 = 72%). A large, highly homogeneous benefit was observed for executive function (TMT-B: SMD = -1.33, 95% CI [-2.39, -0.27], p = 0.01), driven exclusively by the MCI subgroup (SMD = -2.35, 95% CI [-3.20, -1.51], I2 = 0%). Timed Up and Go cognitive-motor dual-task (TUG CMDT)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free