Evidence Hub

Evidence Coverage Evaluator: A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing Grounding Quality in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems

Goutam Adwant, Manjari Srivastav

2026

Abstract

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems have emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing large language models with external knowledge. However, evaluating whether generated answers are properly grounded in retrieved evidence remains a critical challenge. Unlike accuracy-based metrics, evidence coverage evaluates whether each factual claim is explicitly supported by retrieved context, independent of surfacelevel correctness. This paper presents the Evidence Coverage Evaluator (ECE), a comprehensive framework for assessing evidence coverage in RAG-generated answers. ECE introduces two complementary evaluation modes: Mode A, a lightweight NLIbased approach using pre-trained natural language inference models (RoBERTa-MNLI) achieving 0.88-0.91 coverage scores in 2.1-2.8 seconds, and Mode B, an LLM-based judge mode using local Ollama models (Mistral, Llama3, Gemma3, DeepSeek-R1) achieving 0.86 coverage scores with 100% success rates in 23-31 seconds for top-performing models. Our framework extracts finegrained claims from answers, retrieves relevant evidence passages using BM25 or embedding-based methods, and scores claimevidence pairs to compute coverage metrics. Experimental results demonstrate that ECE outperforms baseline methods (keyword matching, BERTScore, direct NLI) by 10-32% in coverage assessment. Additionally, ECE includes advanced features such as citation quality assessment, unsupported claim identification, and actionable feedback generation. The framework is…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free