Evidence Hub

The de-identified data and analysis materials

Zhuangyi Liao, ZE YANG

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2026

Abstract

University financial policies are often distributed across lengthy and heterogeneous documents, making it difficult for staff and students to identify complete and applicable policy provisions. This study investigates whether grounding large language model responses in retrieved institutional policy evidence can improve the completeness and traceability of university financial question answering. We developed an application-oriented policy-grounded retrieval-augmented generation system that combines policy-segment retrieval with constrained response generation. The system was evaluated on 100 Chinese financial-policy questions using a corpus of 190 policy segments and compared with Keyword Search, BM25, and a Native LLM without retrieved policy evidence. The proposed system achieved a key-point coverage of 0.824, which was significantly higher than that of all three baselines. Its traceability score was 0.840 and was significantly higher than those of Keyword Search and BM25. Correctness reached 1.62/2 and was higher than that of both retrieval baselines, although the difference from the Native LLM was not statistically significant. The proposed system also showed the lowest observed hallucination rate (4%) and over-refusal rate (2%); however, the overall hallucination difference was not statistically significant. These findings indicate that policy retrieval and constrained generation can improve answer completeness and make supporting provisions easier to locate in the…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free