Evidence Hub

Evaluating Local LLMs and Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Requirement Checking in Research Funding Applications

Carl Johan Eklund, Jakob Österlund

Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University), 2026

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new opportunities for automating document-intensive tasks, but cloud-based systems are often unsuitable in organizations handling sensitive data. This has increased interest in lower-parameter LLMs suitable for local execution, which offer stronger data control but operate under stricter computational constraints. This thesis investigates whether locally executed LLMs can support requirement checking in research funding applications at the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF). To enable document analysis within limited context windows, a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline was implemented and evaluated. In particular, a naive retrieval approach was compared with an improved Parent-Document Retrieval (PDR) strategy. Several locally executed models were tested under consistent hardware constraints. The evaluation combined automated RAGAS-based metrics with a manual audit of 40 applications across four formal requirement categories: budget, overhead, applicant role, and letter of intent. The results show that performance varied substantially depending on both the model and the requirement type. The strongest results were observed for overhead and role-based checks, while budget evaluation was consistently more difficult due to errors in both numerical extraction and rule application. The improved RAG pipeline increased retrieval quality, especially context precision, but did not eliminate model-level weaknesses in…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free