Editorial Commentary : Large Language Models Like ChatGPT Show Promise, but Clinical Use of Artificial Intelligence Requires Physician Partnership
Abstract
Forcing ChatGPT and other large language models to perform roles reserved for physicians and other health care professionals-namely evaluation, management, and triage-poses a threat from regulatory, risk management, and professional perspectives. The clinical practice of medicine would benefit tremendously from automated administrative support with systems-based transparency and fluidity-not substitution for clinical diagnostics and decision making. ChatGPT and other large language models are not intended or authorized for clinical use, let alone to be tested or rubber stamped for this application. The best clinical use cases of artificial intelligence require physician partnership to enable personal care, minimize administrative burden, maximize efficiency, and minimize risk-without substitution of core physician tasks.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Knowledge Management Perspective of Generative Artificial Intelligence
- Navigating Generative Artificial Intelligence Promises and Perils for Knowledge and Creative Work
- Characterizing the evolving research on enterprise content management
- Large language models and multimodal foundation models for precision oncology
- From Generative AI to Extended Reality: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Challenges, Opportunities, and Future of Educational Computing
- Generative Artificial Intelligence: A New Engine for Advancing Environmental Science and Engineering
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.