Evidence Hub

Metastasis of Renal Cell Carcinoma to Spinal Hemangioblastoma in a Patient with von Hippel–Lindau Disease: A Case Report

Shogo Wakita, Ado Tamiya, Yoshinori Higuchi, H. Kikuchi, Masaaki Kubota, S. Ikegami, Kentaro Horiguchi, J. Ikeda et al.

NMC Case Report Journal, 2021

6 citations

Abstract

von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) disease is characterized by neoplastic and cystic lesions, such as central nervous system (CNS) hemangioblastoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC), arising in multiple organs. Here, we report a case of an RCC that metastasized to a spinal hemangioblastoma in a patient diagnosed with VHL disease. This is a unique case study because visceral neoplasms rarely metastasize to the CNS. The patient had undergone posterior fossa surgery for the removal of hemangioblastomas in the right cerebellar hemisphere as a child. He was diagnosed with RCC at the age of 20 years, and he underwent partial nephrectomy at the age of 35 years. The patient underwent surgical removal of a spinal tumor from Th8, which was also diagnosed as a hemangioblastoma at the age of 40. However, the residual spinal tumor rapidly regrew within 1.5 years. A second surgery was performed due to progressive leg motor weakness. The resected tumor from the second surgery had two distinct components between the tumor center and the margin. Immunohistochemistry of CD10, PAX 8, and inhibin A demonstrated the predominant region of the tumor was RCC. Pathological findings confirmed tumor-to-tumor metastasis of the RCC migrating into residual spinal hemangioblastoma. It can be challenging to distinguish hemangioblastoma from RCC in neuroimaging. We suggest that tumor-to-tumor metastasis should be considered as a differential diagnosis if benign tumors grow rapidly, even if the pathological…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free