Evidence Hub

Carotid Artery Stenting in Right-sided Aortic Arch: A Case Report

Toshiyuki Ohtani, T. Yamazaki, Hiroyasu Ohtaki, Satoshi Nakata, N. Sasaguchi, N. Kato, H. Kurihara, M. Sonobe

NMC Case Report Journal, 2015

10 citations

Abstract

The present report describes a patient with pseudo-occlusion of the left internal carotid artery accompanied by aortic anomalies consisting of right-sided aortic arch with aberrant left subclavian artery arising from Kommerell’s diverticulum. Initial attempt of carotid artery stenting via the trans-femoral approach was unsuccessful because of low origin of the left common carotid artery. Therefore, carotid artery stenting (CAS) via the trans-brachial approach was successfully performed with distal balloon protection. Eight months later, the patient presented with restenosis of the left internal carotid artery, and CAS via the trans-brachial approach was performed again. CAS via the trans-brachial approach should be considered when standard femoral access is relatively contraindicated due to aortic anomalies consisting of a right-sided aortic arch.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free