Evidence Hub

A Purely Endoscopic and Simultaneous Transsphenoidal and Transcranial Keyhole Approach for Giant Pituitary Adenoma Resection: A Technical Case Report

K. Takeuchi, T. Nagatani, Tadashi Watanabe, Eriko Okumura, Yusuke Sato, T. Wakabayashi

NMC Case Report Journal, 2015

11 citations

Abstract

A combined transsphenoidal-transcranial approach for the resection of pituitary adenomas has previously been reported. While this approach is useful for specific types of pituitary adenomas, it is an invasive technique. To reduce the invasiveness of this approach, we adopted the keyhole concept for pituitary adenoma resection. A 23-year-old man presented at a local hospital with a 6-month history of bilateral hemianopia. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a large pituitary adenoma extending from the sella turcica toward the right frontal lobe. Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery was planned at a local hospital; however, the operation was abandoned at the start of the resection because of the firm and fibrous nature of the tumor. The patient was subsequently referred to our hospital for additional surgery. The tumor was removed purely endoscopically via a transsphenoidal and transcranial route. Keyhole craniotomy, 3 cm in diameter, was performed, and a tubular retractor was used to achieve a wider surgical corridor; this enabled better visualization and dissection from the surrounding brain and provided enough room for the use of surgical instruments under endoscopic view. The tumor was successfully removed without complication. This is the first case report to describe the resection of a giant pituitary adenoma using a purely endoscopic and simultaneous transsphenoidal and transcranial keyhole approach.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free