Evidence Hub

Iran's Escherichia coli AMR Landscape (2010-2025): A One Health Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Dehghan A, Arabian M, Tahmasebi Z, Fakhri-Demeshghieh A, Baseri N, Mostafavi E, Badmasti F, Abnaroodhelleh F et al.

MicrobiologyOpen, 2026

Abstract

Escherichia coli (E. coli) has developed resistance to multiple antibiotic classes, complicating treatment in both human and veterinary medicine. This study assesses the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial resistance genes in E. coli in Iran, within a One Health framework encompassing humans, animals, foods, and the environment. We systematically searched Scopus, Google Scholar, Magiran, PubMed, Scientific Information Database Library (SID), and Web of Science, using keywords related to AMR and Escherichia coli, restricting to English and Persian publications from 2010 to January 2025. The risk of bias was evaluated using the JBI checklist for prevalence studies. Pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each antibiotic using random-effects models. A total of 368 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The highest resistance was observed in the Classes of Penicillins (71.7, 95% CI: 65.6-76.6) and the lowest for Fosfomycins (6.8, 95% CI: 5.2-8.5). Resistance to Ceftizoxime, Ertapenem, Streptomycin, Piperacillin-Tazobactam, and Colistin increased over time. Phenotypically, 47.2%, 20.2%, and 14.1% of E. coli isolates were identified as extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing (ESBL), AmpC, and metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) producing, respectively. Among ESBL-producing isolates, the prevalence of blaCTX-M, blaTEM, and blaSHV genes was 68.2%, 58.5%, and 24.4%, respectively. The high prevalence of AMR highlights the critical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free