Evidence Hub

Ceftazidime-avibactam activity against urinary carbapenem resistance Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates

Siavosh Salmanzadeh Ahrabi, Farzaneh Salehinejad, Masoud Sokhanvar-Mahani

Iranian Journal of Microbiology, 2026

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most prevalent bacterial infections in women, with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae as leading causative pathogens. The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and carbapenem-resistant strains poses a significant therapeutic challenge. Ceftazidime–avibactam (CZA) has shown activity against β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria; however, data on its activity against urinary carbapenem-re- sistant isolates remain limited. This study aimed to determine CZA activity against urinary carbapenem-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates.

Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the disk dif- fusion method according to CLSI guidelines. The tested antibiotics included carbapenems, third-generation cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, levofloxacin, fosfomycin, and CZA. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) production was assessed using the combined-disk method.

Results: A total of 76 previously collected urinary bacterial isolates, including 44 (57.9%) E. coli and 32 (42.1%) K. pneumo- niae isolates were included in this study. Carbapenem resistance was detected in 25.0% (11/44) of E. coli and 28.1% (9/32) of K. pneumoniae isolates. ESBL production was observed in 36.4% and 37.5%, respectively. Overall, CZA susceptibility was 68.2% for E. coli and 68.7% for K. pneumoniae, decreasing to 27.3% and 22.2%, respectively, among…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free