Evidence Hub

Development, Validation, and Evaluation of the Pediatric Inflammatory Crohn's Magnetic Resonance Enterography Index From the ImageKids Study

Focht G, Cytter-Kuint R, Greer MC, Pratt LT, Castro DA, Church PC, Walters TD, Hyams J et al.

Gastroenterology, 2022

116 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cross-sectional imaging is important in the assessment of transmural inflammation in Crohn's disease (CD). Small bowel involvement is often more extensive in pediatric CD, requiring a panentering measuring tool. We undertook to develop a magnetic resonance enterography (MRE)-based index that would measure inflammation in all segments of the intestine, without rectal contrast.

METHODS: Children with CD underwent ileocolonoscopy and MRE and half were prospectively followed for 18 months when MRE was repeated. Item generation and reduction were performed by a Delphi panel of pediatric radiologists, a systematic literature review, a cross-sectional study of 48 MREs, and a steering committee. Formatting and weighting were performed using multivariate modeling adjusted by a steering committee. MREs were read locally and centrally. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness were determined using several clinimetric and psychometric approaches.

RESULTS: Thirty items were initially generated and reduced to 5 using regression analysis on 159 MREs: wall thickness, wall diffusion weighted imaging, ulcerations, mesenteric edema, and comb sign. In the validation cohort of 81 MREs, the weighted global PICMI correlated well with the radiologist global assessment (r = 0.85; P 20 points with excellent discriminative validity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS: The PICMI is a valid, reliable, and responsive index…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 116 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free