Evidence Hub

A Systematic Review of Diffusion Models for Medical Image-Based Diagnosis: Methods, Taxonomies, Clinical Integration, Explainability, and Future Directions

Azad M, Fahad NM, Raiaan MAK, Anik TR, Khan MFK, Toyé HMK, Muhammad G

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026

13 citations

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Diffusion models, as a recent advancement in generative modeling, have become central to high-resolution image synthesis and reconstruction. Their rapid progress has notably shaped computer vision and health informatics, particularly by enhancing medical imaging and diagnostic workflows. However, despite these developments, researchers continue to face challenges due to the absence of a structured and comprehensive discussion on the use of diffusion models within clinical imaging. Methods: This systematic review investigates the application of diffusion models in medical imaging for diagnostic purposes. It provides an integrated overview of their underlying principles, major application areas, and existing research limitations. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines and included peer-reviewed studies published between 2013 and 2024. Studies were eligible if they employed diffusion models for diagnostic tasks in medical imaging; non-medical studies and those not involving diffusion-based methods were excluded. Searches were conducted across major scientific databases prior to the review. Risk of bias was assessed based on methodological rigor and reporting quality. Given the heterogeneity of study designs, a narrative synthesis approach was used. Results: A total of 68 studies met the inclusion criteria, spanning multiple imaging modalities and falling into eight major…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free