Evidence Hub

Deep generative models in digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and X-ray angiography: a systematic review

Qiwen Xu, David Rügamer, A. Bender, Mate Elod Maros

Artificial Intelligence Review, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Deep generative models, such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variational autoencoders (VAEs), and diffusion models, have demonstrated remarkable success in static medical imaging tasks, including image synthesis, domain translation, and data augmentation. However, their application to dynamic vascular modalities such as digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and X-ray angiography (XA) has received comparatively limited attention. This systematic review synthesizes 20 peer-reviewed studies published between January 2018 and July 2025, offering a comprehensive analysis of generative model usage in angiographic imaging. We categorize methods by model type, learning paradigm, and application focus, covering tasks such as image generation, vessel segmentation, and stenosis detection. GANs dominate the field, while diffusion models show emerging promise. Key limitations include the scarcity of public datasets, inconsistent evaluation metrics, and limited code availability, which hinder reproducibility and benchmarking. We conclude by outlining methodological trends and highlighting future directions, including the development of anatomically conditioned generative models and the need for large-scale, open-access datasets to support robust evaluation and clinical translation.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free