Evidence Hub

Diffusion tensor imaging versus intraoperative subcortical mapping for glioma resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yiming Li, Jiahe Guo, Kai Zhang, Huijie Wei, Jikang Fan, Shengping Yu, Tao Li, Xuejun Yang

Neurosurgical Review, 2023

1,837 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

Maintaining the integrity of crucial fiber tracts allows functional preservation and improved recovery in patients with glioma resection. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and intraoperative subcortical mapping (ISM) are commonly required for pre- and intraoperative assessment of white matter fibers. This study investigated differences of clinical outcomes in glioma resection aided by DTI or ISM. A comprehensive literature retrieval of the PubMed and Embase databases identified several DTI or ISM studies in 2000-2022. Clinical data, including extent of resection (EOR) and postoperative neurological deficits, was collected and statistically analyzed. Heterogeneity was regressed by a random effect model and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to test statistical significance. Publication bias was assessed by Egger test. A total of 14 studies with a pooled cohort of 1837 patients were included. Patients undergoing DTI-navigated glioma surgery showed a higher rate of gross total resection (GTR) than ISM-assisted surgical resection (67.88%, [95% CI 0.55-0.79] vs. 45.73%, [95% CI 0.29-0.63], P = 0.032). The occurrence of early postoperative functional deficit (35.45%, [95% CI 0.13-0.61] vs. 35.60% [95% CI 0.20-0.53], P = 1.000), late postoperative functional deficit (6.00%, [95% CI 0.02-0.11] vs. 4.91% [95% CI 0.03-0.08], P = 1.000) and severe postoperative functional deficit (2.21%, [95% CI 0-0.08] vs. 5.93% [95% CI 0.01-0.16], P = 0.393) were similar between the DTI and ISM group,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,837 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free