Evidence Hub

Application of Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging: A Systematic Review

Christian John A. Saludar, Maryam Tayebi, Eryn E. Kwon, Joshua P. McGeown, William S. Schierding, Alan Wang, Justin Fernandez, Samantha Jane Holdsworth et al.

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a global health concern, with mild TBI (mTBI) being the most common form. Despite its prevalence, accurately diagnosing mTBI remains a significant challenge. While advanced neuroimaging techniques like diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) offer promise for more robust diagnosis, their clinical application is limited by inconsistent and heterogeneous post-injury findings. Recently, machine learning (ML) techniques, utilizing DTI metrics as features, have shown increasing utility in mTBI research. This approach helps identify distinct between-group features, paving the way for more precise and efficient diagnostic and prognostic tools. PURPOSE: This review aims to analyze studies employing ML techniques to assess changes in DTI metrics after mTBI. STUDY TYPE: Systematic review. POPULATION OR SUBJECTS OR PHANTOM OR SPECIMEN OR ANIMAL MODEL: We conducted a systematic review, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, on the application of ML with DTI for mTBI diagnosis and prognosis on human subjects. This review identified 36 articles. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: N/A. ASSESSMENT: Study quality was assessed using the Modified QualSyst Assessment Tool. STATISTICAL TESTS: N/A. RESULTS: The review found ML techniques using DTI Metrics either alone or in combination with other modalities (i.e., structural MRI, functional MRI, clinical scores, or demographics) can effectively classify mTBI patients from controls. These approaches have also demonstrated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free