Evidence Hub

Variability of renal apparent diffusion coefficients: limitations of the monoexponential model for diffusion quantification

Zhang JL, Sigmund EE, Chandarana H, Rusinek H, Chen Q, Vivier PH, Taouli B, Lee VS

Radiology, 2010

179 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether variability in reported renal apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in literature can be explained by the use of different diffusion weightings (b values) and the use of a monoexponential model to calculate ADC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was approved by institutional review board and was HIPAA-compliant, and all subjects gave written informed consent. Diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging of the kidneys was performed in three healthy volunteers to generate reference diffusion decay curves. In a literature meta-analysis, the authors resampled the reference curves at the various b values used in 19 published studies of normal kidneys (reported ADC = [2.0-4.1] x 10(-3) mm(2) / sec for cortex and [1.9-5.1] x 10(-3) mm(2) / sec for medulla) and then fitted the resampled signals by monoexponential model to produce "predicted" ADC. Correlation plots were used to compare the predicted ADC values with the published values obtained with the same b values.

RESULTS: Significant correlation was found between the reported and predicted ADC values for whole renal parenchyma (R(2) = 0.50, P = .002), cortex (R(2) = 0.87, P = .0002), and medulla (R(2) = 0.61, P = .0129), indicating that most of the variability in reported ADC values arises from limitations of a monoexponential model and use of different b values.

CONCLUSION: The use of a monoexponential function for DW imaging analysis and variably sampled diffusion weighting plays a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free