Risk Factors for Hypervascularization in Hepatobiliary Phase Hypointense Nodules without Arterial Phase Hyperenhancement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine risk factors for hypervascularization in hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointense nodules without arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pubmed and EMBASE databases were searched up to May 7, 2020. Studies which evaluated radiologic and clinical risk factors for hypervascularization in HBP hypointense nodules without APHE were included. Hazard ratios were meta-analytically pooled using random-effects model. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool.
RESULTS: Sixteen studies with 934 patients were included. HBP hypointense nodules without APHE with baseline size greater than 10 mm, T2 hyperintensity, and restricted diffusion showed risk for hypervascularization with pooled HRs of 2.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.94-4.20), 4.21 (95% CI, 1.15-15.40), 5.83 (95% CI, 1.42-23.95), respectively. Previous HCC history contributed to hypervascularization of the nodules with hazard ratio of 2.06 (95% CI, 1.23-3.44). T1 hyperintensity, intralesional fat, Child-Pugh Class B, sex, alfa-fetoprotein, hepatitis B or C infection were not significant risk factors for hypervascularization (p ≥0.05). Study quality was generally moderate.
CONCLUSION: HBP hypointense nodules without APHE on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with baseline size greater than 10 mm, T2 hyperintensity,…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 934 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Learning from First-Generation Qualitative Approaches in the IS Discipline: An Evolutionary View and Some Implications for Authors and Evaluators (PART 1/2)
- Commentary on the clinical and preclinical dosage limits of interstitially administered magnetic fluids for therapeutic hyperthermia based on current practice and efficacy models
- Prosthesis: New Technological Opportunities and Innovative Biomedical Devices
- The history and future of neural modeling for cochlear implants
- Ryanodine receptors: waking up from refractoriness
- Novel Transgenic Rabbit Model Sheds Light on the Puzzling Role of Matrix Metalloproteinase-12 in Atherosclerosis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.