Evidence Hub

Quantitative Consistency of Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted MRI for Brain Tumor Differentiation: Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence

Chung JJ, Ma T, Philbrook P, Zhou T, Goldman-Yassen AE, Sun PZ

Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2026

Abstract

Background/objectives: Accurate grading of brain gliomas is important, and amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) MRI shows promise for non-invasive tumor differentiation. This study aimed to perform a comprehensive review and meta-analyses to demonstrate heterogeneity in both the diagnostic accuracy and quantitative consistency of APTw MRI in distinguishing high-grade gliomas (HGGs) from low-grade gliomas (LGGs), highlight issues with reporting standards and identify sources of heterogeneity through meta-regression.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted between 1 January 2013 and 18 January 2026, following PRISMA guidelines. Peer-reviewed articles in English reporting diagnostic accuracy/contrast values of APTw MRI and study parameters were included. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to extract the principal components (PCs) of the chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) contrast mechanism. Random-effects meta-analyses and univariate meta-regression models using individual CEST parameters and three PCs were performed. Forest plots with pooled estimates were generated. Leave-one-out meta-analysis (LOOMA) and complete case analysis were performed to examine the effects of outliers and missing data, respectively.

Results: A total of 31 studies were included. Meta-analyses of the AUC and mean difference demonstrated significant heterogeneity across the studies (I2 = 73.9% & 78.2%, p p = 0.034) and the total PC (p = 0.02). The heterogeneity for the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free