Evidence Hub

Association Between Pulse Pressure and Structural Brain Changes in Aging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Studies

Cecelja M, McNally R, Cleary J, Chowienczyk P

Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025

20 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between pulse pressure (PP) and age-related structural brain changes including brain volumes, white matter hyperintensities (WMH), fractional anisotropy, silent brain lesions, microbleeds, cerebral blood flow and metabolism, and beta-amyloid accumulation.

Methods: Systematic review of PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Ovid Embase (from inception to January 2023) and references of included studies among adult populations was conducted. Findings were summarized narratively and by performing a fixed-effects meta-analysis. Publication bias was tested by a funnel plot and Egger's regression asymmetry test.

Results: Forty-seven studies (7 longitudinal) were included (>20 000 participants). In cross-sectional studies, PP consistently positively associated with gray matter volume and white matter hyperintensities with pooled standardized regression coefficients of 0.02 (95% CI, 0.007-0.038) and 0.06 (95% CI, 0.021-0.093), SD increase in PP per 1 SD increase in gray matter volume and white matter hyperintensities, higher odds of having a silent brain lesions pooled odds ratio of 1.11 (95% CI, 1.03-1.20) for 1 SD increase in PP, and cortical beta-amyloid (pooled estimate not available). There was limited evidence of an association with hippocampal volume, fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity, cerebral microbleeds, cerebral blood flow and velocity, and cerebral metabolism. Longitudinal studies reported a negative…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free