Predictive Value of Machine Learning Models for Cerebral Edema Risk in Stroke Patients: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Stroke patients are at high risk of developing cerebral edema, which can have severe consequences. However, there are currently few effective tools for early identification or prediction of this risk. As machine learning (ML) is increasingly used in clinical practice, its effectiveness in predicting cerebral edema risk in stroke patients has been explored. Nonetheless, the lack of systematic evidence on its predictive value challenges the update of simple and user-friendly risk assessment tools. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the predictive utility of ML for cerebral edema in stroke patients.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database up to February 21, 2024. The risk of bias in selected studies was assessed using a bias assessment tool for predictive models. Meta-analysis synthesized results from validation sets.
Results: We included 22 studies with 25,096 stroke patients and 25 models, which were constructed using common and interpretable clinical features. In the validation cohort, the models achieved a concordance index (c-index) of 0.840 (95% CI: 0.810-0.871) for predicting poststroke cerebral edema, with a sensitivity of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.72-0.79) and a specificity of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83-0.90).
Conclusion: ML models are significant in predicting poststroke cerebral edema, providing clinicians with a powerful prognostic tool. However, radiomics-based research was not included. We anticipate…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 25,096 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Learning from First-Generation Qualitative Approaches in the IS Discipline: An Evolutionary View and Some Implications for Authors and Evaluators (PART 1/2)
- Commentary on the clinical and preclinical dosage limits of interstitially administered magnetic fluids for therapeutic hyperthermia based on current practice and efficacy models
- Prosthesis: New Technological Opportunities and Innovative Biomedical Devices
- The history and future of neural modeling for cochlear implants
- Ryanodine receptors: waking up from refractoriness
- Novel Transgenic Rabbit Model Sheds Light on the Puzzling Role of Matrix Metalloproteinase-12 in Atherosclerosis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.