Evidence Hub

Diffusion-weighted imaging for staging chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis

Haitian Liu, Zhang-Jian Zhou, Xiang Li, Chen-Xia Li, Rong Wang, Yuelang Zhang, G. Niu

British Journal of Radiology, 2018

31 citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) by apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) obtained from diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) using a meta-analysis. Methods: Literature databases were searched from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and Embase to identify relevant articles about DWI in CKD between 1999 and 2017. ADC values were extracted from the healthy group and CKD patients with different stages. Meta-analysis was conducted using STATA v. 12.0. A random-effects model was performed to acquire the effect estimate, which was expressed as a pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). We performed comparisons of ADC values between the following groups: (1) the ADC values of the normal kidneys v s earlier Stage 1–2 of CKD; (2) Stage 3 v s the Stage 1–2 of CKD; (3) the Stage 4–5 v s the Stage 3. Results: Six studies were included in this meta-analysis. The CKD patients with earlier Stage 1–2 showed lower ADC values than the healthy subjects [WMD = −0.09, 95% CI(−0.12 to −0.06), p < 0.001]. However, no obvious difference in ADC values was found between the Stage 3 and Stage1–2 of CKD [WMD = −0.09, 95% CI (−0.18 to 0.01), p = 0.08]. The CKD Stage3 had higher ADC values than those of Stage4–5 [WMD = −0.21, 95% CI (−0.32 to −0.11), p = 0.01]. Conclusion: DWI is an accurate and non-invasive imaging technique for early diagnosis and staging of CKD. Quantitative DWI may potentially play a role in making clinical decisions in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free