Evidence Hub

Association between white matter alterations and domain-specific cognitive impairment in cerebral small vessel disease: A meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging

Xie Y, Xie L, Kang F, Jiang J, Yao T, Mao G, Fang R, Fan J et al.

Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2022

6,558 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) findings and domain-specific cognitive impairment in cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD).

METHODS: Databases such as PubMed, Excerpta Medical Database (EMBASE), Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure Databases (CNKI), Wanfang, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (SinoMed), and Chongqing Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP) were comprehensively retrieved for studies that reported correlation coefficients between cognition and DTI values. Random effects models and meta-regression were applied to account for heterogeneity among study results. Subgroup and publication bias analyses were performed using Stata software.

RESULTS: Seventy-seven studies involving 6,558 participants were included in our meta-analysis. The diagnosis classification included CSVD, white matter hyperintensities (WMH), subcortical ischemic vascular disease, cerebral microbleeding, cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL), and Fabry disease. The pooled estimates showed that the fractional anisotropy (FA)-overall exhibited a moderate correlation with general cognition, executive function, attention, construction, and motor performance (r = 0.451, 0.339, 0.410, and 0.319), and the mean diffusitivity/apparent diffusion coefficient (MD/ADC)-overall was moderately associated with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 6,558 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free