Evidence Hub

Ophthalmic Image Synthesis and Analysis with Generative Adversarial Network Artificial Intelligence

Masalkhi M, Sporn K, Kumar R, Ong J, Nguyen T, Waisberg E, Zaman N, Lee AG et al.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026

Abstract

Generative adversarial networks (GANs), introduced by Ian Goodfellow in 2014, have revolutionized adversarial machine learning, particularly in data synthesis. This manuscript explores their application in ophthalmic diagnostics, addressing the scarcity of annotated datasets and the need for improved early disease detection. By leveraging GAN architectures, the goal is to enhance the quality of synthetic ophthalmic images, ultimately improving diagnostic algorithm training. A systematic review was conducted from January to April 2024 across PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Search terms included "Generative Adversarial Networks" and "ophthalmic image synthesis." Articles were selected based on relevance to retinal image generation and diagnostic improvement in ophthalmology. GANs show considerable promise in generating high-resolution retinal and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Models like DR-GAN and Pix2Pix have successfully synthesized images that resemble real diagnostic data, proving valuable when annotated datasets are scarce. GAN-generated images enhance training for algorithms detecting diseases such as diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, and age-related macular degeneration. Recent advances, including conditional GANs and CycleGANs, have enabled disease-specific image generation, boosting the diversity of training datasets, particularly in resource-limited settings. Integrating GANs into ophthalmic diagnostics represents a significant leap in medical AI, offering…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free