Evidence Hub

Deep learning algorithms for predicting pathological complete response in MRI of rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review

Jong BK, Yu ZH, Hsu YJ, Chiang SF, You JF, Chern YJ

International journal of colorectal disease, 2025

Abstract

PURPOSE: This systematic review examines the utility of deep learning algorithms in predicting pathological complete response (pCR) in rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). The primary goal is to evaluate the performance of MRI-based artificial intelligence (AI) models and explore factors affecting their diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS: The review followed PRISMA guidelines and is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024628017). Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library using keywords such as "artificial intelligence," "rectal cancer," "MRI," and "pathological complete response." Articles involving deep learning models applied to MRI for predicting pCR were included, excluding non-MRI data and studies without AI applications. Data on study characteristics, MRI sequences, AI model details, and performance metrics were extracted. Quality assessment was performed using the PROBAST tool.

RESULTS: Out of 512 initial records, 26 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies demonstrated promising diagnostic performance, with AUC values for external validation typically exceeding 0.8. The use of T2W and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI phases enhanced model accuracy compared to T2W alone. Larger datasets generally correlated with improved model performance. However, heterogeneity in model designs, MRI protocols, and the limited integration of clinical data were noted as challenges.

CONCLUSION: AI-enhanced MRI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free