Evidence Hub

Mapping global inequities in telemedicine implementation: An umbrella review of barriers and facilitators

Capodici A, Filippeschi A, Noci F, Michelucci A, El Motarajji S, Benedetto V, Vandelli A, Passino C et al.

PloS one, 2026

106 participants

Abstract

Telemedicine expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic, yet its diffusion has remained uneven across health systems. Whether implementation challenges differ systematically across economic contexts, and what implications these differences hold for global digital health equity, has not been comprehensively characterized. This study presents an umbrella review (PROSPERO CRD42024615998) of systematic reviews and meta-analyses indexed in PubMed and Scopus through December 2025 that reported barriers and/or facilitators to telemedicine implementation. Methodological quality was appraised using R-AMSTAR. Reported items were extracted verbatim, embedded with the Universal Sentence Encoder, and grouped into thematic clusters using HDBSCAN density-based clustering, with parameters optimized by SLSQP for cluster cohesion (median intra-cluster similarity ≥ 0.5). Analyses were stratified by World Bank country income group to characterize context-specific implementation profiles, identify evidence gaps, and detect orphaned barriers, defined as challenges lacking any corresponding documented facilitator. A total of 161 systematic reviews were included, yielding 1,333 barriers and 504 facilitators (corresponding to a barrier-to-facilitator ratio of 2.6:1). Across all settings, the most frequently reported barriers were high costs (n = 106), technical issues (n = 94), and training and knowledge (n = 91). Thematic profiles differed markedly by income group: high-income countries reported…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 106 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free