Evidence Hub

Radiomics and artificial intelligence-based prediction of tumor response in digestive system neoplasm: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yu S, Gong M, Wang H, Liu H, Deng M

Frontiers in medicine, 2026

Abstract

Background: Radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI) are progressively gaining recognition for predicting tumor response, recurrence, and prognosis in gastrointestinal tumors. The current review singled out the diagnostic and prognostic potential of AI and radiomics in the whole GI tract.

Methods: Out of 120 ongoing studies from the year 2016 to 2025, the following applications were covered: endoscopy, colonoscopy, capsule endoscopy, intraoperative guidance, CT/MRI radiomics, and molecular/histopathology AI models. The performance across studies was assessed by meta-analysis using random-effects modeling that incorporated inverse variance methods. Results from the analysis of heterogeneity (I 2), publication bias (funnel plots, Egger's test), methodological quality (Radiomics Quality Score, RQS), and risk of bias (PROBAST) were reported.

Results: The use of AI in detection and diagnosis assisted with the endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract (OR = 16.12, 95% CI: 7.72-33.65), colonoscopies for colorectal polyps (OR = 12.0, 95% CI: 10.26-14.03), and capsule endoscopy (OR = 10.16, 95% CI: 8.32-12.4) and was proven to be very effective. Intraoperative guidance also was proven to be an effective surgical decision-making tool (OR = 8.12, 95% CI: 7.12-9.26), whereas an AI-based strategy for patient risk assessment predicted the occurrence of lymph node metastasis, molecular tumor types, and patient survival (OR = 9.62, 95% CI: 7.93-11.66). Radiomic models forecasted tumor…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free