Cell-Based Computational Models of Organoids: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Organoids are self-organizing multicellular structures generated in vitro that recapitulate the micro-architecture and function of an organ. They are commonly derived from stem cells but can also emerge from pieces of proliferative tissues. Organoid technology has opened novel ways to model development and disease, but it is not without challenges. Computational models of organoids have been established to elucidate organoid growth and facilitate the optimization of organoid cultures. This article is a systematic review of in silico organoid models constructed at single-cell or subcellular resolution. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for original papers published in peer-reviewed journals before 26 September 2025, yielding 439 records after deduplication. Two independent reviewers screened their titles and abstracts, retrieved 84 papers for full-text scrutiny, and identified 32 papers that met the inclusion criteria. They were grouped by organoid type: 12 intestinal, 1 airway, 2 pancreas, 3 neural, 1 kidney, 1 inner cell mass, 9 tumor, and 3 generic. The analysis of these works revealed that computer simulations guided experimental work. Parsimonious computational models provided insights into diverse organoid behaviors, such as the rotation of airway organoids, size oscillations of pancreatic organoids, epithelial patterning of neural tube organoids, or nephron segment formation in kidney organoids. Generally, a deep understanding was achieved through…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in cell cultures (in vitro) and computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Learning from First-Generation Qualitative Approaches in the IS Discipline: An Evolutionary View and Some Implications for Authors and Evaluators (PART 1/2)
- Commentary on the clinical and preclinical dosage limits of interstitially administered magnetic fluids for therapeutic hyperthermia based on current practice and efficacy models
- Prosthesis: New Technological Opportunities and Innovative Biomedical Devices
- The history and future of neural modeling for cochlear implants
- Ryanodine receptors: waking up from refractoriness
- Novel Transgenic Rabbit Model Sheds Light on the Puzzling Role of Matrix Metalloproteinase-12 in Atherosclerosis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.