Evidence Hub

Brain Health Loss Mediates the Effect of Infarct Volume on Functional Outcome in Ischemic Stroke

Lindgren E, Angeleri L, Alhadid K, Jern C, Lindgren AG, Maguire J, Regenhardt RW, Rost NS et al.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025

1,048 participants

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Brain health may facilitate resilience to detrimental consequences from neurological diseases. Infarct volume is associated with poor functional outcome after acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but potential mediating effects through stroke-related brain health loss have not been investigated.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether stroke-related brain health loss, quantified by change in MRI derived effective Reserve (eR), mediates the effect of acute infarct volume on functional outcome after AIS.

DESIGN: Observational multicenter cohort study.

SETTING: We analyzed data from the GASROS (n=488) and MRI-GENIE (n=560) cohorts, collected 2003-2011.

PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients consecutively diagnosed with AIS, with available admission MRI.

EXPOSURE: At admission, white matter hyperintensity (WMH) and normal-appearing brain volumes were assessed on T2-FLAIR, and acute infarct volume on diffusion weighted imaging. WMH was normalized by brain volume, creating WMH load. We quantified brain health using eR, a latent variable incorporating age, WMH load, and normal-appearing brain volume. ΔeR reflected the change in eR when acute infarct volume was included, representing stroke-related brain health decline. Mediation analysis was used to determine if ΔeR mediates the effect of infarct volume on functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] at 90 days).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of mediating effect.

RESULTS: We included 1,048 patients (median age 67y, 38% females). At…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,048 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free