Evidence Hub

Normative modeling for quantitative brain MRI phenotyping and biomarker discovery for pediatric leukodystrophies

Karandikar S, Sevagamoorthy A, Zimmerman D, D'Aiello R, Dorfschmidt L, Cyr K, Jung B, Levitis E et al.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026

7,205 participants

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Leukodystrophies are a heterogeneous group of genetic disorders affecting the white matter of the brain, often presenting with overlapping clinical features but differing in neuroanatomical involvement. There is a critical need for quantitative tools to characterize disease burden and support diagnosis, severity stratification, and clinical trial readiness.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize shared and distinct neuroanatomical patterns across six genetically confirmed leukodystrophies using anatomical MRI-derived phenotypes benchmarked against brain growth charts, and to assess the utility of this methodological approach for identifying imaging biomarkers of disease severity.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional neuroimaging study using retrospective clinical MRI data.

SETTING: Multicenter study incorporating data from the Global Leukodystrophy Initiative Clinical Trials Network (GLIA-CTN) and control data from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.

PARTICIPANTS: The study included 434 MRI scan sessions from 274 patients with genetically confirmed leukodystrophies (Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease, Metachromatic leukodystrophy, Alexander disease, Aicardi-Goutières syndrome, TUBB4A-related leukodystrophies, and POLR3-related leukodystrophy). Control MRI data (7628 scans from 7205 subjects) were drawn from the Scans with Limited Imaging Pathology cohort at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.

EXPOSURES: All MRI scans underwent automated segmentation using deep learning segmentation…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 7,205 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free