Evidence Hub

In vivo human neurite exchange imaging (NEXI) at 500 mT/m diffusion gradients

Chan KS, Ma Y, Lee H, Marques JP, Olesen J, Coelho S, Novikov DS, Jespersen S et al.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024

15 participants

Abstract

Evaluating tissue microstructure and membrane integrity in the living human brain through diffusion-water exchange imaging is challenging due to requirements for a high signal-to-noise ratio and short diffusion times dictated by relatively fast exchange processes. The goal of this work was to demonstrate the feasibility of in vivo imaging of tissue micro-geometries and water exchange within the brain gray matter using the state-of-the-art Connectome 2.0 scanner equipped with an ultra-high-performance gradient system (maximum gradient strength=500 mT/m, maximum slew rate=600 T/m/s). We performed diffusion MRI measurements in 15 healthy volunteers at multiple diffusion times (13-30 ms) and b -values up to 17.5 ms/μm2. The anisotropic Kärger model was applied to estimate the exchange time between intra-neurite and extracellular water in gray matter. The estimated exchange time across the cortical ribbon was around (median±interquartile range) 13±8 ms on Connectome 2.0, substantially faster than that measured using an imaging protocol compatible with Connectome 1.0-alike systems on the same cohort. Our investigation suggested that the NEXI exchange time estimation using a Connectome 1.0 compatible protocol was more prone to residual noise floor biases due to the small time-dependent signal contrasts across diffusion times when the exchange is fast (≤20 ms). Furthermore, spatial variation of exchange time was observed across the cortex, where the motor cortex, somatosensory…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 15 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free