Evidence Hub

RE: Differential Diagnosis of Axillary Inflammatory and Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Rabbit Models by Using Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Compared with Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

A. Sivrioğlu, G. Sonmez, M. Incedayı, Muzaffer Saglam

Korean Journal of Radiology, 2013

Abstract

Korean J Radiol 14(3), May/Jun 2013 kjronline.org RE: Differential Diagnosis of Axillary Inflammatory and Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Rabbit Models by Using Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Compared with Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ali Kemal Sivrioglu, MD, Guner Sonmez, MD, Mehmet Incedayi, MD, Muzaffer Saglam, MD Department of Radiology, AKSAZ Military Hospital, Mugla 48750, Turkey; Department of Radiology, GATA Haydarpasa Training Hospital, Istanbul 34040, Turkey

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a editorial / letter, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free