Evidence Hub

Outpatient antibiogram and predictors of ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistant urinary tract infections

Valentine-King M, Zoorob R, Grigoryan L, Trautner B

Annals of family medicine, 2022

189 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Context: Rising antibiotic resistance has transcended hospital boundaries and impacted individuals with community acquired urinary tract infections (UTI). Scant data on antibiotic resistance in outpatient settings exists and most studies in the United States (U.S.) have identified predictors of resistance in acute-care settings. Objective: Determine the antibiogram among Escherichia coli isolates and factors associated with ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) resistant gram-negative urinary isolates. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Two primary care, safety-net clinics in Houston, TX between 11/2018 and 3/2020. Population studied: Patients aged 18 and older presenting with provider suspected uncomplicated or complicated UTI. Outcome measures: Resistance and predictors of resistance to UTI-relevant antibiotics. Results: Among 1265 cultures collected, 372 (28.4%) were positive. We detected E. coli (50.3%) and Group B Streptococcus (18.6%) most frequently. Our patient population consisted mostly of Hispanic (75.7%) females (92.5%) born outside the U.S. (67.3%) with a mean age of 47. Among patients with E. coli isolated (n=189), antibiotic resistance was highest to ampicillin (63%), TMP-SMX (44%), ciprofloxacin (31%), and cefazolin (30%); no or low resistance against amikacin (0%), fosfomycin (0%), and nitrofurantoin (2.7%) was detected. Approximately 12% of E. coli isolates were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase positive. Having a prior…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 189 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free