Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin treatment in urinary tract infections (UTIs) in adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Gutiérrez-Castrellón P, Díaz-García L, de Colsa-Ranero A, Cuevas-Alpuche J, Jiménez-Escobar I

Gaceta medica de Mexico, 2015

13 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RGT) on the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin in the treatment of acute or complicated urinary tract infections in adults. Primary outcomes were bacteriological eradication, clinical cure, bacterial resistance, and adverse event rates.

RESULTS: Initially, 111 RGTs were identified. We excluded 81 studies due to low quality methodology. An analysis of the remaining RGTs identified therapeutic equivalence of ciprofloxacin against other antimicrobials in terms of bacterial eradication and clinical cure at the end of treatment and in subsequent stages. The percentage of bacterial resistance was similar in both groups, while the percentage of related adverse events was significantly lower in the groups treated with ciprofloxacin.

CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that ciprofloxacin is a safe and effective therapeutic alternative for the treatment of acute or complicated urinary tract infections in adults.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free