Evidence Hub

Evaluation of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Production and 28-Day Mortality Predictors in Urine Cultures of Hospitalized Elderly Patients

Yılmaz K, Büyükkörük M, İnan AÖ

Urologia internationalis, 2026

261 participants

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the associated factors for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production in Enterobacterales isolated from urine cultures of hospitalized elderly patients and to identify independent predictors of ESBL positivity and 28-day mortality.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at Soma State Hospital involving 261 patients aged 65 years and older hospitalized between January 1, 2025 and January 1, 2026. Bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed using the VITEK 2 automated system in accordance with EUCAST guidelines. Risk factors for ESBL production and mortality were determined using multivariate logistic regression models.

Results: The median age of the cohort was 81 years, and 64.0% (n = 167) of the isolates were ESBL-positive. While Escherichia coli was the most frequently isolated pathogen overall (48.7%), Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common organism in the ESBL-positive group (53.3%). Multivariate analysis identified urinary catheter use (aOR = 2.044, 95% CI: 1.178-3.548, p = 0.011) and length of stay of ≥7 days (aOR = 1.905, 95% CI: 1.083-3.352, p = 0.025) as independent risk factors for ESBL positivity. Independent predictors of 28-day mortality included age (aOR = 1.082, p < 0.001), urinary catheter use (aOR = 1.941, p = 0.023), and higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (aOR = 1.035, p = 0.036). Notably, ESBL positivity was not significantly associated with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 261 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free