Evidence Hub

Antimicrobial Resistance, Biofilm Formation, and Phylogenetic Distribution of Escherichia coli in Hospitalized Patients with Community-Onset Urinary Tract Infections in Western Mexico

Zepeda-Gutiérrez LA, Ramírez-Ochoa S, Ambriz-Alarcón MA, Cervantes-Pérez E, Castillo-Romero A, Licona-Lasteros KC, Cortés-Zárate R

Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026

Abstract

Background/objectives: Escherichia coli is the predominant pathogen in community-onset urinary tract infections (UTIs) requiring hospitalization. This study characterized antimicrobial resistance profiles, biofilm formation, extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) gene distribution, and phylogenetic background of E. coli isolates from hospitalized UTI patients in Western Mexico.

Methods: Seventy isolates (September 2023-September 2024) underwent susceptibility testing (CLSI M100, 35th edition), multiplex PCR for blaTEM, blaCTX-M, and blaSHV genes, crystal violet biofilm quantification, and Clermont quadruplex PCR phylotyping. Associations were evaluated by Fisher's exact test with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR (BH-FDR) correction.

Results: ESBL phenotype and MDR were detected in 57.1% and 58.6% of isolates. After BH-FDR correction, ESBL production was significantly associated with amikacin (OR = 5.55; 95% CI: 1.80-18.74; q = 0.002) and TMP-SMX non-susceptibility (OR = 3.00; 95% CI: 1.02-9.23; q = 0.036); ciprofloxacin non-susceptibility was linked to MDR status (OR = 7.21; 95% CI: 1.28-75.66; q = 0.017) but not ESBL phenotype. Biofilm was detected in 77.1% of isolates. blaTEM predominated among ESBL producers (85.0%). Phylogroup B2 (51.4%) was inversely associated with recurrent UTI on both univariate (OR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.03-0.73; p = 0.008) and adjusted analysis (adjusted OR = 0.19; 95% CI: 0.05-0.81; p = 0.025). Phylogroup C (22.9%) exhibited the highest MDR prevalence (81.3%) and…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free