Evidence Hub

Clinical characteristics, causative organisms, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of hospital-acquired invasive gram-negative bacterial infections at a tertiary-care center in Saudi Arabia: a five-year retrospective cohort study (2020-2024)

Awadh AA, Alshokani AA, Ezzaddin AO, Bintalib AF, Alwafi MT, Alghamdi AA, Samkri SF, Khan MA

BMC infectious diseases, 2026

377 participants

Abstract

Background: Hospital-acquired gram-negative bacterial (HA-GNB) infections are a leading cause of nosocomial morbidity and mortality, yet local epidemiological data to guide empirical therapy remain limited.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 377 adult patients with culture-confirmed invasive gram-negative infection acquired ≥ 48 h after admission to King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (2020-2024). Demographics, comorbidities, infection type, microbiology, susceptibility, complications, and outcomes were analyzed using chi-square/Fisher's exact tests and t-tests/Mann-Whitney U tests; multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of multidrug-resistant (MDR) infection and in-hospital mortality. Infection types were classified according to U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention / National Healthcare Safety Network (CDC/NHSN) surveillance definitions.

Results: Mean age was 64.6 ± 17.7 years (59.4% male). Hypertension (61.0%), diabetes (54.6%), and cardiovascular disease (40.8%) were the commonest comorbidities. Pneumonia predominated (47.1%), followed by bloodstream infection (33.0%), surgical-site infection (15.7%), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (9.6%). Klebsiella pneumoniae (41.9%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (34.0%), and Escherichia coli (15.4%) were the predominant pathogens. Resistance was highest for ciprofloxacin (44.4%), ceftazidime (40.2%), and cefepime (39.9%), and 34.3% for meropenem.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 377 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free