Evidence Hub

Assessment of antimicrobial use among patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital: A prospective observational study using World Health Organization AWaRe and Indian Council of Medical Research guidelines

Ankur, Kapur P, Shree N, Chhabra R, Dubey K

Indian journal of pharmacology, 2026

289 participants

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance has emerged as a global challenge to human health, primarily due to inappropriate use. The ICMR reports revealed that there is sustained rise of AMR in India.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the prescribing pattern of antimicrobials and rationality of empiric antimicrobial use in a tertiary care hospital.

Method: A prospective observational study, approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) was conducted for a period of one year from July 2023 to June 2024 among the admitted patients of the hospital. The prescribing pattern was assessed in accordance with AWaRe classification and prescribing indicators by the World Health Organization. Rational use of empiric therapy was assessed as per the ICMR 2022 guidelines.

Results: A total of 653 antimicrobials were prescribed to 289 patients and maximum antimicrobials were from Watch category (55.7%), followed by Access (40.4%), and Reserve category (2.3%). The respiratory tract infection was the most common indication to start empiric antimicrobial therapy. The empiric therapy was appropriate for 80.3% patients as per the ICMR guidelines. The observed deviations were the empiric use of amikacin for bone & joint infection, duplicate beta lactam therapy, 3rd generation cephalosporins for uncomplicated urinary tract infection, the use of Reserve antibiotic-linezolid, and the use of piperacillin/tazobactam for sepsis patients.

Conclusion: There is a need to strengthen…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 289 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free