Evidence Hub

Trends in antimicrobial resistance of major gram-negative uropathogens, 2016-2024: A single center retrospective study

Kim JA, Noh HS, Kim JH

Investigative and clinical urology, 2026

11,358 participants

Abstract

Purpose: Resistance to empiric antimicrobials has become markedly higher among gram-negative uropathogens in Korea, compared to those in Europe and North America. To guide empiric treatment strategies and to build real evidence, we conducted a retrospective analysis of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns from urine cultures obtained at a university hospital.

Materials and methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) results from initial positive urine cultures (n=11,358, both inpatients and outpatients) collected between 2016 and 2024 were reviewed. The analysis focused on predominant gram-negative isolates-Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Resistance rates were determined for twelve commonly used antimicrobials, including third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, carbapenems, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, nitrofurantoin, and fosfomycin.

Results: Between 2016 and 2024, AST identified E. coli (n=6,533), K. pneumoniae (n=1,348), P. mirabilis (n=677), and P. aeruginosa (n=663). While fluoroquinolone resistance remained persistently high (31.5%-44.5% in E. coli, 6.9%-37.0% in K. pneumoniae), its annual trend showed to be stable. Cefepime resistance increased steadily in most gram-negative isolates (annual percentage change [APC]=16.1%-25.0%). Although Carbapenem resistance remained low but it increased steadily in E. coli and K.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 11,358 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free