Evidence Hub

Nav1.8 Variant I206M as a Latent Susceptibility Factor in Postaxotomy Ocular Pain

Mohammad‐Reza Ghovanloo, Philip R. Effraim, Sidharth Tyagi, Alecia M. Aldrich, Jun‐Hui Yuan, Betsy R. Maller Schulman, Deborah S. Jacobs, Sulayman D. Dib‐Hajj et al.

Neurology Genetics, 2026

2 citations

Abstract

Background and Objectives: A small proportion of patients develop persistent ocular pain after corneal refractive surgery, which injures the distal axons of trigeminal ganglia neurons innervating the eye. In this study, we investigate the role of a low-frequency Nav1.8 variant, c.618A > G (p.I206M), in the pathogenesis of persistent ocular pain after corneal refractive surgery. Methods: . We characterized its functional effects using patch-clamp electrophysiology, computer simulations, and multielectrode array recordings of transfected rat trigeminal neurons. Results: p.I206M produced a hyperpolarizing shift in activation of ∼5 mV without significant effects on current density, inactivation, persistent currents, or recovery kinetics. Modeling predicted a small increase in excitability, attenuated under simulated heterozygous conditions. MEA recordings indicated a significant increase in firing frequency in trigeminal neuron firing at 33 and 37°C for p.I206M vs reference (wild-type) neurons. Discussion: Although subtle, the p.I206M activation shift may lower the excitability threshold of trigeminal neurons. In the context of axotomy-induced remodeling of the electrogenisome, such variants may act as latent susceptibility factors for chronic ocular pain. Together with prior findings of Nav1.7, TRPV1, and TRPM8 variants in this same cohort, these results support a multihit model, in which rare gain-of-function ion channel variants combine with nerve injury to drive persistent…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free