Evidence Hub

Urinary tract infections in renal transplant recipients

Süheyla Serin Senger, Hande Arslan, Özlem Kurt Azap, Funda Timurkaynak, Ünal Çağır, Mehmet Ali Haberal

Transplantation Proceedings, 2007

66 citations

Abstract

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common infectious complication following renal transplantation. The purposes of this study were to determine the causative agents of UTIs among renal transplant recipients and to compare the antibiotic susceptibilities of Escherichia coli strains isolated from renal transplant recipients and complicated community-acquired UTIs. We evaluated 75 episodes of 63 recipients with confirmed UTI who underwent transplantation during the period 1981 to 2006 at our center. Medical records of the patients were reviewed retrospectively. To compare the susceptibility rates of E coli, 226 isolates from nontransplant patients with complicated community-acquired UTIs were also evaluated. Ten episodes (13.3%) occurred in the first month following the transplantation, 11 (14.7%) in the period of the second month to the sixth month, and 54 (72%) after the sixth month of transplantation. Forty-six (61.3%) isolates were E coli. Among these isolates, ciprofloxacin resistance rates were 50% (2/4) in the first month after transplantation, 75% (6/8) in the period of the second month to the sixth month, and 32.4% (11/34) beyond 6 months after transplantation. The resistance rates of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) in the same time periods were 100% (4/4), 87.5% (7/8), and 70.6% (24/34), respectively. The rates of resistance to TMP-SMX among E coli isolated from renal recipients were significantly higher than those in community-acquired complicated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free