Evidence Hub

Oral Stepdown Therapy for Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Onorato L, De Luca I, Ferrante M, Ricciardiello G, Monari C, Coppola N

European journal of clinical investigation, 2026

10,000 participants

Abstract

Background: Early oral step-down has been proposed as a strategy to optimize antimicrobial use in Gram-negative bloodstream infections (BSIs).

Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of full-text studies published in English and indexed in MEDLINE and EMBASE up to April 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies including patients with Gram-negative BSIs managed either with oral step-down within 5 days of IV therapy or with continued IV therapy were eligible. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies.

Results: Of 4120 screened records, 13 studies (3 RCTs and 10 cohort studies) including 10,000 patients met the inclusion criteria; 5016 of enrolled patients (52%) switched to oral therapy, mainly to fluoroquinolones (2992, 59.6%). A lower all-cause mortality was observed in patients receiving oral step-down (RR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.16-0.93; p = 0.034). When stratifying studies according to timing of the switch to oral therapy, no significant difference in mortality was observed in studies with a median switch time ≤ 3 days (p = 0.29). Conversely, studies with a median switch time > 3 days showed a lower mortality rate in the oral step-down group, approaching statistical significance (p = 0.051). No significant differences were found between treatment groups in terms of clinical failure (p = 0.28). Microbiological failure was significantly less frequent…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 10,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free