Evidence Hub

Epidemiological trends in antibiotic resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in healthcare settings in Burkina Faso: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Soma D, Diarra FBJ, Diallo D, Somda NS, Garba Z, Sore S, Bako E, Nikiema MEM et al.

BMC infectious diseases, 2026

Abstract

Introduction: Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) is a major pathogen involved in nosocomial and community-acquired infections, whose multidrug resistance (MDR) constitutes a public health emergency. Data reporting of antibiotic-resistant K. pneumoniae in healthcare settings in Burkina Faso is often insufficient and poorly documented. This study aimed to estimate, through a meta-analysis, the prevalence of phenotypic and molecular resistance to antibiotics of K. pneumoniae in Burkina Faso.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using studies published between 2015 and 2025, identified through PubMed, African Journals Online, Scopus, and Google Scholar, using specific keywords, following the PRISMA guidelines. Data on resistance to different classes of antibiotics and genetic determinants were extracted. A meta-analysis of proportions using a random effects model was used to estimate the pooled resistance rates. This study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with registration ID: CRD420261290027.

Results: The pooled prevalence of resistance in K. pneumoniae was 44% (95% CI: 0.36-0.53). The highest resistance rates were observed to penicillin (85%) and third-generation cephalosporins (50%), while carbapenems remained the most effective class (11%). The molecular analysis revealed that aminoglycoside resistance genes were the most prevalent (53%), driven by aac(3)-IIc (78%) and aac(6')-Ib (62%)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free