Evidence Hub

Antimicrobial resistance among clinical Enterobacterales isolated from humans in Senegal: a systematic review and meta-analysis from 1987 to 2022

Dossouvi KM, Cissé A, Sow O, Niang EHA, Ndiaye I, Sambe Ba B, Seck A, Camara M

BMC infectious diseases, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The mitigation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a priority in every part of the world. Understanding AMR dynamics in Senegal is crucial for updating empirical antimicrobial treatments, adapting public health policies, and guiding future research. Therefore, this study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical Enterobacterales resistance to 15 antimicrobials, determine AMR trends, and report the genetic determinants of AMR reported in Enterobacterales strains isolated from humans in Senegal over the past four decades. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA 2020) were used and the protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database with registration number (CRD420251007413). Data analyses were conducted using Stata software, version 17.0, and consisted of a random-effects model analysis to estimate pooled AMR rates, publication bias assessments, and meta-regression analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-nine research articles met the inclusion criteria and were selected for this study. A total of 7911 Enterobacterales strains were studied. These strains were isolated between 1987 and 2022, mainly from urine [23 studies; 61% (95% CI: 45, 74)], blood [15 studies; 39% (95% CI: 26, 55)], and stool [15 studies; 39% (95% CI: 26, 55)]. The overall pooled AMR rates ranged from 3% (95% CI: 1, 5) for carbapenems to 66% (95% CI: 53, 77) for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free