Evidence Hub

Antimicrobial resistance pattern of Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolate in Ethiopia. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Asmare Z, Tamrat E, Erkihun M, Endalamaw K, Alelign D, Getie M, Sisay A, Gashaw Y et al.

BMC infectious diseases, 2025

26,539 participants · 17 citations

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing global health threat. Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) emerged as one of the most concerning critical priority pathogens due to its ability to develop resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents. In Ethiopia, the public health impact of AMR is increasingly significant, with A. baumannii responsible for a variety of infections. Although A. baumannii causes a range of infections in Ethiopian patients, the drug resistance status of the clinical isolates has not been thoroughly assessed. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the country-wide AMR of A. baumannii.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We conducted a search of articles on PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, Scopes electronic databases, Google Scholar search engine, and institutional repositories/libraries for studies published between 2015 and 2024. Eligible studies on A. baumannii-related infections and AMR in Ethiopia were assessed for quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) criteria. Data on study characteristics were extracted, and statistical analyses, including heterogeneity (Invers of variance), publication bias (Eggers test), and subgroup analyses, were performed using STATA 17.0. A random effect model was used to compute the pooled prevalence of AMR.

Results: This systematic review and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 26,539 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free