Evidence Hub

Non-O157 shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in Africa: a one health systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and clinical outcomes

Akinduti PA, Odoom A, Darkwah S, Ugbo EN, Aniweh Y, Donkor ES

Scientific reports, 2026

13 participants

Abstract

Non-O157 Shiga Toxin–Producing Escherichia coli (non-O157 STEC) pathogens cause considerable debilities and were reviewed for its prevalence, antimicrobial Resistance, and clinical outcomes in Africa from a One Health perspective. Following the PRISMA guidelines, studies reporting non-O157 STEC in human, animal, environmental and food samples from African countries were retrieved from African Journals Online, Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and PubMed. Retrieved data were analyzed using random-effects model by the DerSimonian–Laird method and assessment of risk-of-bias for individual studies, with Egger’s test. Of 22 included studies, most were conducted in Northern Africa (59%, n = 13). The most frequently reported STEC serogroups were O26 (26.60%), O45 (8.21%), O111 (7.6%), O121 (3.34%), O145 (4.10%), O78 and O91 (4.10%). Virulence genes including Stx1 (24.9%), stx2 (19.7%), and eae were commonly detected in isolates from human samples than in isolates from other sources. Pooled prevalence of non-O157 STEC in African countries was 20.7% (95% CI: 11.1–30.2, I2 = 97.4%, p = 0.0001) with combined human-animal sources pooled prevalence of 27.3% (95% CI: 9.2–45.3; I2 = 98.6%; p = 0.0001). More than 10% pooled resistance to commonly used antibiotics and high proportion of strains harboring blaTEM, blaVIM, blaNDM, blaCTX, blaOXA encoding ESBLs, tet variants for tetracycline, sul1 and sul2 encoding resistance for sulphamethoxaole, and qnrS (for fluoroquinolone resistance)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 13 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free