Evidence Hub

Epidemiology of clinical antimicrobial-resistant Enterobacterales in Togo over three decades: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with recommendations and alternative solutions

Dossouvi KM, Sellera FP, Ibadin EE, Adeshola IAC, Djanta KA, Amesse CAG, Egoh YS, Ametepe AS et al.

BMC infectious diseases, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Background: According to the World Health Organization (WHO), surveillance programs have become essential at national, regional, and global levels to adjust empirical treatments and target interventions to prevent and control the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Therefore, this study aimed to conduct the first systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical Enterobacterales resistance to 11 representative antimicrobials from the WHO AWaRe (Access, Watch, Reserve) list, and to provide recommendations to tackle AMR more efficiently in Togo.

Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (The PRISMA 2020) were used to conduct this study and the protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024606897). Keywords were used to conduct a systematic literature review of electronic databases. Data analysis was conducted using Stata software version 17.0.

Results: Twenty research articles reporting 9,327 clinical Enterobacterales isolates obtained from 1991 to 2020 were included in this review and were mainly Escherichia coli (6,639; 71.2%), and Klebsiella spp. (2,542; 27.3%), mainly isolated from urine (14 studies; 70%), and pus/wounds (12; 60%). The pooled Enterobacterales resistance rates ranged from 1% (95% CI: 0, 2) imipenem, 3% (95% CI: 1, 5) amikacin, 4% (95% CI: 2, 7) fosfomycin, 50% (95% CI: 40, 60) chloramphenicol, 55% (95% CI: 45, 64) gentamicin, 68% (95% CI: 59, 76) ciprofloxacin, 73% (95% CI: 66, 80)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free