Evidence Hub

Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Bacterial Clones in West Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis from a One Health Perspective

Yartey SN, Kungu F, Asantewaa AA, Donkor ES

Scientific reports, 2025

6 citations

Abstract

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria are associated with life-threatening infections with limited treatment options worldwide. In this review, we assess the circulating ESBL-producing bacterial clones from human, animal, and environmental sources in West Africa, through a One Health approach. A systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified 485 records, with 38 studies analysed. Data were organized thematically and pooled prevalence estimates calculated through a random-effects meta-analysis. Results showed a 16.8% (95% CI [12.1; 22.1]) prevalence of ESBL-producing bacteria, with Escherichia coli (64%) being the most frequently detected species. Humans were the most affected (20.4%), followed by animals (12.8%) and the environment (9.3%). Among the 153 identified bacterial clones, ST10, ST410, ST58, ST155, ST4684, ST2178, and ST37, found majorly in E. coli, occurred across multiple sources, suggesting cross-sectoral transmission. The blaCTX-M gene, prevalent with several fluoroquinolone and aminoglycoside resistance genes, was often on conjugative IncF plasmids (50.0%), suggesting high horizontal transmission potential. The emerging ESBL gene, GES (1.2%) was also detected in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The findings reinforce the need for robust antimicrobial resistance monitoring and intervention strategies in West Africa. A regional One Health-based approach is necessary to curtail the spread of resistant bacterial clones and safeguard…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free