Evidence Hub

Prevalence and molecular characterization of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Egypt: a systematic review and meta-analysis of hospital and community-acquired infections

Azzam A, Khaled H, Samer D, Nageeb WM

Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2024

21 citations

Abstract

Background: ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) represent a significant global health threat. In response to this growing concern and the lack of a surveillance system for ESBL-PE infections in Egypt, we conducted this meta-analysis. In this study, we aimed to quantify the prevalence of ESBL-PE based on the source of infection and characterize their molecular dissemination. Additionally, we sought to uncover temporal trends to assess the spread of ESBL-PE over time.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and the Egyptian Knowledge Bank to identify studies that: (1) report the prevalence of ESBL-PE in Egypt; (2) use valid detection methods; (3) involve clinical specimens; and (4) were published between 2010 and 2024. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the "Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist". Meta-analysis was performed using the R meta package, reporting pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CI) via a random effects model.

Results: This meta-analysis included 34 studies with 4,528 isolates, spanning 2007 to 2023. The overall prevalence of ESBL-PE in Egypt was 60% (95% CI: 54-65). The leave-one-out meta-analysis demonstrated the absence of influential outliers and Egger's test indicated no evidence of publication bias (P = 0.25). The prevalence of ESBL-PE was 62% (95% CI: 55-68) in nosocomial infections and 65% (95% CI: 52-75) in community-acquired…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free