Evidence Hub

Pooled prevalence of Escherichia coli phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance profiles in poultry: systematic review and meta-analysis

Sousa DLC, Limeira CH, Casella T, Araújo HG, Aquino VVF, Neto DA, Sobrinho JDS, Azevedo SS et al.

Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Escherichia coli is a zoonotic bacterium, and its resistance to antimicrobials has become an increasing problem in global health. This study aimed to determine the phenotypic and genotypic pooled prevalence of E. coli with antimicrobial resistance profiles in poultry through systematic review and meta-analysis. Articles available in scientific databases from years 2017 to 2024 were evaluated. Overall, 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis and prevalence of E. coli resistance in poultry. Estimated by the random effects model, the pooled prevalence of resistance to at least one antibiotic in E. coli isolated from poultry samples was 76.96% (95% CI = 48.74-92.15%), and multidrug-resistant isolates of 89.44% (95% CI = 75.51-95.88%). The highest prevalence was to nalidixic acid (86.67%; 95% CI = 59.32-96.67%), followed by isolates resistant to tetracycline (79.33%; 95% CI = 62.86-89.69%). Tetracycline resistance genes had the highest prevalence, with 29.78% of isolates (498/1076) positive for at least one of the three genes (tetA, tetB and/or tetC). The levels of phenotypic and genotypic prevalence of E. coli in poultry can provide a scientific basis for the control of antibiotic-resistant strains and contribute to the competent authorities to guide the management interventions that best suit the different geographical regions.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free