Evidence Hub

D-Mannose for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection in adult women: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Mrinal Murali Krishna, Meghna Joseph, Vinicius Pereira, Afshan Nizami, Chidubem Ezenna, Lal Sadasivan Sreemathy

Journal of Infection Prevention, 2025

890 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Purpose Approximately 50%–60% of adult women experience at least one episode of urinary tract infection (UTI) during their lifetime, with 20%–24% of them experiencing recurrence within a year. Several randomized controlled trials have explored the efficacy and safety of D-mannose for the prevention of UTI in adult women but reported conflicting results. Objective We performed a meta-analysis comparing D-mannose with placebo or no treatment for the prevention of UTI in adult women. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central databases for studies comparing D-mannose with placebo or no treatment for the prevention of UTI in adult women. The outcomes of interest were recurrent UTIs during follow-up and adverse events. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Analysis followed the PRISMA guideline and was registered in the PROSPERO database. Results The systematic review identified 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 890 participants (D-mannose n = 447, 50.22%). Recurrent UTI (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.18–1.11; p = .082; I2 = 90%) and adverse events (RR 2.19; 95% CI 0.68–7.05; p = .190; I2 = 79%) did not differ significantly between the groups at the end of follow-up. Conclusion Prophylaxis with D-mannose did not cause any difference in the risk of recurrent UTI during follow-up and adverse events in adult women. Fewer number of studies and heterogeneity in the results make it difficult to draw conclusions about the efficacy of D-mannose in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 890 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free